Swap Nodes in Pairs

Problem

Given a linked list, swap every two adjacent nodes and return its head. You must solve the problem without modifying the values in the list’s nodes (i.e., only nodes themselves may be changed.)

Example 1:

Input: head = [1,2,3,4]
Output: [2,1,4,3]

Example 2:

Input: head = []
Output: []

Example 3:

Input: head = [1]
Output: [1]

Constraints:

  • The number of nodes in the list is in the range [0, 100].
  • 0 <= Node.val <= 100

Solution

I almost reached for an approach where I would reverse the entire linked list and worked backwards, but this was simpler.

/**
 * Definition for singly-linked list.
 * public class ListNode {
 *     int val;
 *     ListNode next;
 *     ListNode() {}
 *     ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
 *     ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
 * }
 */
class Solution {
    public ListNode swapPairs(ListNode head) {
        var curr = head;
        var next = head != null ? head.next : null;
        ListNode prev = null;

        // special case: first node
        head = next == null ? head : next;

        while (curr != null && next != null) {
            curr.next = next.next;
            next.next = curr;

            if (prev != null) {
                prev.next = next;
            }
            prev = curr;

            curr = curr.next;
            if (curr != null) {
                next = curr.next;
            }
        }

        return head;
    }
}

Recent posts from blogs that I like

My fireside chat about agentic engineering at the Pragmatic Summit

via Simon Willison

A weekend with Misia: 1

After marrying her cousin, the couple entertained Proust, Mallarmé, Gide, Debussy, and were patrons of Monet, Renoir, Odilon Redon, Signac and Toulouse-Lautrec.

via The Eclectic Light Company

Big tech engineers need big egos

It’s a common position among software engineers that big egos have no place in tech1. This is understandable - we’ve all worked with some insufferably overconfident engineers who needed their egos checked - but I don’t think it’s correct. In fact, I don’t know if it’s possible to survive as a softwa...

via Sean Goedecke